Collapse bottom bar
Your Location: You're in the jungle, baby! X
Hunting Indiana Whitetail

Indiana’s 2011 Deer Outlook Part 2: Finding Trophy Bucks

by Paul Moore   |  November 8th, 2011 7

Last month, we took a look at the big picture for deer hunting in Indiana. We discussed deer numbers, management issues, top spots for hunter harvest, and where to go to fill that tag. This month, we’re going to narrow the focus and concentrate on bucks only and trophy bucks in particular. We’ll look at some recent trends and offer suggestions on where to seek out that trophy deer in the Hoosier State. But, just what is a trophy buck?

Photo by Victor Schendel

A trophy is purely relative. It’s relative to experience, equipment choices, age and personal desire. A trophy buck to a child or newbie hunter may not even classify as a shooter buck for a veteran hunter with lots of bone on the wall. A trophy buck may mean only one that qualifies for Pope & Young or Boone & Crockett. Or it could be as simple as a first antlered buck taken with a bow. Regardless of how a trophy is defined, Hoosier hunters are very blessed with a lot of great deer and there are plenty out there that would be considered true wall-hangers by any standard.

Indiana hunters have been having quite good success in taking decent antlered bucks in the state. One reason is the percentage of the total harvest being comprised of bucks has been reduced from years past. This keeps more antlered deer in the population and gives them more time to mature. Back in 1987 and 1988, antlered deer comprised 57 percent of the total harvest. That number has been declining due to management changes and more selective harvest by hunters. Last season, the buck harvest amounted to 40 percent of the total.

Firearm hunters took the most adult antlered bucks with 46 percent of the total firearm harvest being bucks. The next closest was early archery season hunters who netted 34 percent antlered bucks. All other seasons were much lower.

Some folks attribute the success seen today to the One Buck Rule (OBR), which was implemented in 2002. A survey done by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in 2006 found that some 70 percent of deer hunters in the state supported the OBR. The DNR is currently working with an independent research group to survey about 20,000 deer hunters to determine their attitudes toward the OBR and compare how those attitudes have changed since 2006. The OBR must be renewed every five years and will be up for renewal after this season concludes.

The OBR may not actually be the direct cause of better deer hunting, but it may have helped sway hunters to more selective harvest, thereby improving buck quality. Chad Stewart, deer research biologist for the DNR, explained, “The Division has always maintained that the OBR is more of a social issue than a biological issue. Prior to 2002, approximately 15 percent of hunters took two bucks in a year, so the actual impact of decreasing the limit to one buck is minimal.

One con that is always brought up is that the buck hunting opportunity is lost for multi-season hunters. The Division has noticed a drastic decrease in the percentage of yearlings harvested since the OBR was implemented. However, this trend was declining prior to the OBR.

Click image to enlarge

Many items have changed throughout the course of the OBR and since its inception: antlerless licenses have been liberalized, license costs have increased, hunters are likely aging and looking to harvest more mature deer, the food plot revolution has increased, etc. It is unknown whether the OBR has actually changed the male deer herd structure, or just the mentality of the hunter in choosing to harvest a buck. The only thing that is certain is that Hoosier hunters are taking more mature bucks today than they were 10 years ago.”

Indiana is but one state that is part of a shift in quality deer harvest over the past few decades. In the past, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Texas were hailed as the big buck states. Then states such as Illinois, Kansas, Ohio, Iowa and Kentucky started entering the mix. Now, Indiana is being mentioned right up there with the big boys as being a go-to spot for trophy deer.

When talking trophy deer, there is always much debate. One needs only to jump on the Internet and peruse some of the chats and message boards to find Indiana hunters bickering back and forth about whether or not Indiana has good trophy potential and whether or not the OBR has helped. Recently, writers in major national magazines have touted the Hoosier State as being in the top-five best spots for taking a trophy-book deer, but hunters still argue the criteria used to reach that conclusion. One report from 2001-2006 ranked Indiana sixth for most Boone & Crockett entries per square mile (PSM) and fifth for most Pope & Young entries PSM. Looking at the cold, hard facts sheds a little light on the situation and quells some of the debate.

The Quality Deer Management Association (QDMA) is one of the recognized national leaders in monitoring and encouraging deer management to produce trophy animals. The QDMA is comprised of some of the best whitetail biologists and deer managers in the country. There are some very interesting statistics found the QDMA’s Whitetail Report 2011.

The estimated antlered buck harvest for animals 1 1/2 years and older during the years of 2007-2009 was compiled in the report. Indiana hunters took 49,375, 50,845, and 52,981 bucks, respectively, in each of those three years. The increase between 2008 and 2009 was four percent. The number of bucks taken per square mile was 1.5, which matches exactly the average PSM harvest for all Midwestern states. The number of bucks taken PSM ranged from 0.4 in North Dakota to 3.7 in both Michigan and Wisconsin.

Now, breaking that down by age structure shows Hoosier harvest of immature bucks is decreasing while the harvest of mature bucks is increasing. During those three years, the percentage of bucks 1 1/2 years old decreased from 44 percent to 40 percent and then to 36 percent in 2009. Bucks 2 1/2 years old increased from 39 percent to 40 percent. The harvest of bucks 3 1/2 years old went from 17 percent in 2007 to 20 percent in 2008 and then to 24 percent in 2009. The Midwest average for bucks 3 1/2 years old in 2009 was 23 percent. It must be noted, however, that the average percentage was tallied from less than half of the 13 states that make up the Midwest category in the report. The remaining states did not provide percentage data.

These numbers, as well as other harvest data, appear to point toward hunters being much more selective in what they take. Stewart said, “Over the past 10 years, hunters are definitely shooting more older deer (2 1/2-years-old and older) than yearling deer. Of deer checked in during opening weekend of last year’s firearms season, 60 percent of the bucks killed were 2 1/2-years or older. We have hit sort of a plateau in recent years (since 2008) as far as yearling harvest, but it is a significant improvement from the late 1990s or early 2000s.”

Stewart said, “Trophy bucks can be found in any and all counties. Indiana has great white-tailed deer habitat that is capable of producing high-quality deer after just a couple of years.” For sure, much of the state deer quality is attributed more to genetics, the habitat and terrific food sources rather than a true trophy management plan by the DNR. Stewart explained, “Our goal as a division is primarily to balance the deer herd with the available habitat while minimizing conflicts with people. Trophy management and buck quality will always take a backseat to that primary goal. That being said, we realize that many hunters value high-quality deer, and if we can improve those numbers while meeting our primary goal of balancing the herd, then we will attempt to do so.”

Okay, so now we have determined that there are plenty of trophy deer available in the state. The next step is to determine where to find them. Certainly it is correct to say a trophy deer could come from any place in the state. However, there are specific areas of the state that seem to put out a higher percentage of mature bucks than others.

Stewart likes to point hunters toward counties with high deer-harvest numbers. Regarding trophy deer, he said, “I don’t have specific numbers, but I would suspect high-kill counties such as Parke, Harrison and the counties in the northeast and southeast to be at the top or near the top of the list. In general, where there are a lot of deer, I would expect there to be higher trophy or book entries.” He added, “I have worked check stations in the southern part of the state and have seen some deer that any hunter would be proud to take. Counties like Franklin, Harrison, Parke and Switzerland seem to put out great deer each year. I have heard that up north, counties like Kosciusko, Steuben, LaGrange and Marshall put out some great deer.”

Hoosier hunters took more than 2,000 deer in 17 counties and more than 3,000 deer in five counties last season. There were 1,000 or more antlered bucks taken in nine different counties last season. Ranked in order, they were Steuben (1,389), Kosciusko (1,231), Switzerland (1,204), Parke (1,100), Noble (1,097), Washington (1,049), Franklin (1,044), Marshall (1,027) and Dearborn (1,016).

The problem most hunters have when seeking a trophy deer is one of access. The best opportunity for taking a trophy animal is on properties where the deer aren’t constantly pressured. Big bucks are obviously very wary and hunter-educated, so they tend to be less visible during shooting hours in areas of heavy pressure. This doesn’t bode well for the hunter without private land on which to hunt. However, there are some public land hunting opportunities for trophies, too, if one knows where to look and is willing to put in the extra effort required to take a quality deer deliberately and not just due to pure, dumb luck.

In southern Indiana, hunters may want to target some of the bigger state and national forests. These areas offer a lot of area to spread out both hunters and deer. The trick to hunting trophies on these properties, and any other heavily-pressured areas for that matter, is to really study maps of the area, do some scouting, and find out where other hunters are focusing their efforts. Then look for possible escape routes and sections of the properties where other hunters are likely not to go due to a lack of roads, distance from parking, or other difficulties. This is where the trophy hunter will find less-pressured bucks.

The Hoosier National Forest is the largest and totals about 200,000 acres. There are a lot of huge deer on the Hoosier, but again, extra effort is usually required to find them. For more information, call (812) 275-5987 or visit

Another good choice is the Jackson-Washington State Forest. Washington County was the sixth-best county last year for antlered buck harvest. The property has a total of nearly 18,000 acres, most of which is open for hunting. Hunters can visit the forest office, located about 2 1/2 miles southeast of Brownstown on State Road 250, or contact Property Manager Brad Schneck at (812) 358-2160 for more information on hunting at the forest.

The Harrison-Crawford SF and the Owen-Putnam SF offer good options as well. The former totals about 24,000 acres and the latter 6,245 acres. The Harrison-Crawford SF office is located about 10 miles west of Corydon at 7240 Old Forest Road SW. Hunters can reach property manager Dwayne Sieg at (812) 738-7694. Contact the Owen-Putnam SF at (812) 829-2462 or visit the office at 2153 Fishcreek Road, near Spencer.

Hunters in the northern part of the state don’t have all the forest options, but there are some good fish and wildlife areas (FWA) on which to seek trophy bucks. Hunting these areas is just like hunting the southern forests. Hunters must do the homework and find out where other hunters aren’t going and then target their efforts in these areas of least pressure.

The Kankakee FWA has 4,295 acres and is located mostly in Starke County. Contact the property at (574) 896-3522. Willow Slough FWA has nearly 10,000 acres in Newton County, right along the Illinois border. The FWA may be reached by phone at (219) 285-2704. Pigeon River FWA may be called at (260) 367-2164. This property features 17 miles of river bottomland and over 11,600 acres of land. It is located in LaGrange and Steuben counties. As mentioned earlier, Steuben County was the top-rated county last year for most antlered bucks harvested. The J. Edward Roush Lake property in Huntington County should also be considered. It has over 7,000 acres of land in addition to the lake. Hunters may call (260) 468-2165 for more info.

Many of these properties mentioned have special site-specific regulations. Contact the properties directly and learn the rules before going afield.

  • Daniel

    The biggest problem Hoosiers have now is the amount of out of state Hunters coming into Indiana and leasing property. The property owners are not required by the state to register or notify the state. Many of the property owners are not claiming this cash income. I can not beleive the state of Indiana is allowing this to happen. Property owners are taking these huge sums of income from those out of state whom are capable of paying 2 to 3K a year to hunt a small 20 to 50 acre plot of woods. This amount of unclaimed income is then usally used to buy more land. This forces the Indiana residents to hunt state property and if you read the report you have to hike about 5 miles into the state property to even think about seeing a trophy buck. I would like to see the state of Indiana Forestry tackle this part of deer management. Don't forget the residents of Indiana when your calculating a sucessfull hunting opportunity for all.

    • Jack

      Do you have a problem with hiking 5 miles? If so you can always pay for a lease, but you are certainly not forced to do anything. The "state of Indiana Forestry" does not have any idea that you think there is a problem to tackle, you should contact their office immediately.

  • Daniel

    Walking 5 miles and dragging a 200 lb deer 5 miles is just not a physical option for me.
    Please dont misunderstand me. When I say forced, i mean i must make a decision, do I still want to hunt? or can I even afford to hunt considering these changing conditions? I think the state of Indiana does a great job on managing the forestry. I'm just looking at broader aspect that I believe is not being monitored and will eventually have an impact on the average income hunter. I have been unable at this point to find any information detailing the number of out of state hunters sucessful harvest or for that matter the number of leased properties. What amount of income is the State of Indiana loosing out on by not requiring leased property at least be monitored to determine if there truely is an impact. Just wanted to kick this around with others.

  • Brian

    Indiana will never have the leasing issues that states like Illinois and Iowa have because of it's desire to be a "gun first" state. Also, this state is years behind the times. I lease property in Illinois simply because I want to see quality deer. Indiana residents are still averse to leasing which in my opinion leaves out the resident, like me, who never could break into the "good ol boy" network of getting permission on prime land. Also, I had a small lease in Starke county that was over run by poachers at night. By the way, where are you getting your pricing on lease rates. I pay $1600 for 40 acres in the quad city area and was paying only $1200 for 87 acres in Starke county.

    • Daniel

      Check out Looks like Indiana land owners are charging more per acre. Not sure what amount of the pricing is dependent on the third party leasing company or how they help the land owner evaluate what their property is worth. This is what the next generation of deer hunting is coming to. I believe the government at the state level will be regulating leases within the next 5 to 10 years. They are going to want their cut eventually.
      As for the "good ol boy network" I can't really get any breaks there either.

      If you can afford $1600 a year to lease can you not purchase a chuck of property? Maybe you share the expense with a group? I know that Indiana gives huge tax discounts on land if you have it classified. You have to follow the forestry regulations but you could pay as little as $1.99 a year taxes on 75 acres.

      If you get a chance, could you explain to me the "gun first" state?

  • Brady Miller

    The biggest problem with indiana is the firearm season is way too long, look at illinois and Iowa and all the other record producing states. They have different, week seasons that come in throughout the year and they dont start their firearm season untill mid-to late november unlike indiana who starts right in prime time so more younger deer get slayed. I wish indiana would realize that if they would set up a legit management program for bigger healthy heards instead of pushing shooting 8 does a year and destroying our heard they would be making alot more money. Jack up the non-resident tag prices, Its just over 100 bucks to hunt indiana non-resident, I spent almost 500 to hunt illinois last year. Thats where they will make their money!!!

  • Neil Goffinet

    I live in spencer county indiand and i talked with chad stewart last year about all the anterless permits to harvest anterless deer and here it has knocked the crap out of the population i bought 40 acres 25 yr ago and i would see 15 to 30 deer on opening day different bucks and does the same year the anterless permits were avaiable the deer had a sickness where they would dehydrate and many were found dead near water. Now I hardly see deer last year during bow i seen a few does and a small buck when gun came in I did not see any and no sign till thanksgiving day i found fresh tracks this year i seen a couple six pointers in bow and a nice ten point and does gun came in one spike and one doe opening day for spike and doe last night nothing today and their has not been many shots around couple opening day of gun but they were at least 3/4 mile away. My grandfather and a game warden started perry county conservation club in the 1940s and they had deer flowen in from St Lewis if i knew things would go this way i would have gotten more info and documented it but the season was thanksgiving day then it went to four days and now its like three months he started that so his grandkids could enjoy hunting and i am one of his grandkids and i dont think he would like what is going on with something he had a passion for i want my kids and grand kids to enjoy hunting and when you get up at dark go to your stand cold or warm rain or snow its worth it when you see several deer all day long when you go out and see nothing but birds and tree rats it kinda make you not want to go and thats where my kids are now its not much fun when you dont see nothing trust me i know i have not harvested a deer for seven years and this may be eight i want a big buck and the last part of season i may get one for some meat if i see one thats been the trouble in the past wait and i dont see any. i hope the DNR can see my point and let the herd gain population and then kill a few anterless deer who know when another strand of sickness will hit them again make it exciting for our youth to go and hunt. Thank You and i hope others agree with my assement of killing off the herd

back to top